and worldwide, self-identify as religious or spiritual. Rachel: So… why is it important to engage with religious people about science? Well, most people, both in the U.S. Interestingly, other studies suggest that most Americans learn about science from popular media, informal science settings like museums, or their social networks and communities, and not through formal science education. According to a survey done every 2 years since the 1980’s, this support has remained fairly consistent. Rob: Happily, Americans are broadly supportive of science. This means scientists should be prepared to engage constructively with policymakers and communities too. It’s important to remember, though, that in these discussions, scientists aren’t just talking with other scientists, and scientists aren’t the only ones with expertise or insight on science and society issues. Rachel: So public engagement with science is important, but why should scientists themselves do it? Scientists have valuable expertise in their areas of study, and there are many topics where their direct involvement as experts can be important for framing, understanding, or discussing science topics or issues. A growing body of research suggests that engagement, as we’ve just described it, is more impactful. Facts are important, but facts are not enough. In more recent years, research on science communication has consistently shown that just providing facts and data doesn’t necessarily influence people’s opinions. Rob: Historically, science communication has focused on presenting facts and data clearly. O Being responsive to issues and concerns raised through discussion O Addressing the benefits and limitations of science O Listening to and respecting diverse communities and individuals O Multi-directional dialogue that incorporates varied perspectives Rachel: So, what is public engagement with science? AAAS defines it as “intentional, meaningful interactions that provide opportunities for mutual learning between scientists and members of the public.” This includes: Public engagement with science can help integrate public views and scientific expertise to inform personal and communal action, including policy. It’s critical for scientists to hear diverse perspectives on science and technology to help identify potential challenges and problems, to evaluate solutions, and to find common ground. The science and society relationship is complex it can be constructive, disruptive, or something in between. Today we’ll discuss why considering culture, including faith and spirituality, is important for inclusive public engagement with science.
I DOSER MULTIPLE O SERIES
This is part 1 of our 4-part series on Science Engagement with Faith Communities. Rachel: Since 1995, DoSER has facilitated communication and engagement about science between scientific and religious communities, recognizing that these often overlap. Rob: We’re joining you from the Dialogue on Science, Ethics, and Religion (or “DoSER” for short), a program of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.